Two years later...

... and I'm still pissed at OMSI

And for those idiots who think this is science, then please explain to me what is more scientific about having dead babies in jars than having models in an exhibit room designed for children. I still can't figure that one out...especially considering that the children who were with us on this trip weren't intrigued by the "scientific" aspect, rather, they were intrigued by the sensationalism of the morbid exhibit.

You know what - I have more questions to ask:
- Is it a child in a woman's womb the day before it is born, or is it a "fetus"?
- Is it a child in a woman's womb when it moves around on its own, jumps when it gets startled or hears a loud noise, is it not aware of those things?
- Aside from an umbilical cord and a breath of air, what is the difference between a child in its mother's womb and a child that has just been born?
- Why is it wrong to defend an unborn child's right to be born and live, but we must protect a murderer from being executed? - On that same note, how is a single woman more capable of determining that her child should die from an abortion, but a jury of 12 is wrong in determining a killer should die from an execution?
- If life is so prescious that we need to protect whales, salmon, elephants, rain forrest etc - then how come a blind eye is turned when it comes to unborn babies?